GS v Protective Commissioner and Guardianship Tribunal [2003] NSWADTAP 52

GS v Protective Commissioner and Guardianship Tribunal [2003] NSWADTAP 52

The Tribunal properly identified and applied the statutory test for review of a financial management order, and afforded GS procedural fairness by providing an opportunity to present evidence and submissions. The absence of the original applicant did not affect the Tribunal's jurisdiction. No error of law was made out, and leave to appeal on other grounds was not granted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 October 2003
Procedural Posture
External Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed; decision affirmed
Legal Topics
['financial Management Order' 'procedural Fairness' 'statutory Test for Review' 'appointment of Manager']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

External Appeal / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal applied the correct statutory test on review' 'Whether GS was afforded procedural fairness' 'Whether the absence of the original applicant affected jurisdiction' 'Whether principles in s 4 of the Guardianship Act 1987 were observed' 'Whether the appointment of the Protective Commissioner as financial manager should be reviewed']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal properly identified and applied the statutory test for review of a financial management order, and afforded GS procedural fairness by providing an opportunity to present evidence and submissions. The absence of the original applicant did not affect the Tribunal's jurisdiction. No error of law was made out, and leave to appeal on other grounds was not granted.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; decision affirmed

Orders

  • ['The decision of the Guardianship Tribunal is affirmed.' 'Appeal dismissed.']