G.T.K. Trading Pty Ltd v. Export Development Grants Board [1981] FCA 226
Live lobsters caught off the Western Australian coast and prepared as described are 'goods', are not 'live-stock' within the meaning of the Act, and are 'produced' or 'processed' in Australia; their value is wholly of Australian origin, making them eligible for grant consideration under the Export Expansion Grants Act 1978.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Referral of Questions of Law Under S.45 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 / Questions of Law Referred by Tribunal to Federal Court
- Outcome
- Questions of law answered as specified
- Legal Topics
- ['export Expansion Grant' 'eligible Goods' 'livestock' 'produced in Australia' 'processed in Australia' 'act Interpretation' "definition of 'livestock'" 'export of Seafood Products']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Referral of Questions of Law Under S.45 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 / Questions of Law Referred by Tribunal to Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether live lobsters are 'goods' within s.4(1) of the Export Expansion Grants Act 1978" "Whether live lobsters are 'live-stock' within the meaning of 'excluded goods' in s.3(1) of the Act" "Whether live lobsters are 'manufactured', 'produced', 'assembled' or 'processed' within s.4(1) of the Act" "Whether lobsters are 'produced' or 'processed' in Australia" 'Whether any of the value of the lobsters is attributable to materials or parts not of Australian origin' "Whether live lobsters are 'eligible goods' within s.4(1) of the Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
Live lobsters caught off the Western Australian coast and prepared as described are 'goods', are not 'live-stock' within the meaning of the Act, and are 'produced' or 'processed' in Australia; their value is wholly of Australian origin, making them eligible for grant consideration under the Export Expansion Grants Act 1978.
Court Disposition
Questions of law answered as specified
Orders
- ['Question 1: Yes' 'Question 2: Yes in relation to production and processing but not manufacture or assembly' 'Question 3: Yes' 'Question 4(a): Does not arise' 'Question 4(b): No' 'Question 4(c): Yes' 'Question 5: No' 'Question 6: Yes']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment