Zoeller, G. v The Honourable Bowen, L.F. (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth) & Ors [1987] FCA 501
The Extradition (Foreign States) Act 1966 permits multiple extradition proceedings provided each follows the statutory procedure, and the 'speciality' rule is satisfied by undertakings current at the time of surrender. The second s.15 notice was validly executed by an Acting Minister in accordance with s.19 of the Acts Interpretation Act, and the seizure of the applicant's property was unlawful as it occurred before the requisition was made.
- Parties
- Applicant: Guenter Zoeller; First Respondent: The Honourable Lionel Frost Bowen, Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia; Second Respondent: The Honourable Michael John Duffy, Minister of State for Trade Negotiations; Third Respondent: Stanley David Kitchener Hyde, Magistrate; Fourth Respondent: Kevin Robert Webb, Magistrate; Fifth Respondent: The Federal Republic of Germany; Sixth Respondent: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police; Seventh Respondent: Raymond Carlin
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application partly granted and partly dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Multiple Extradition Proceedings, Speciality Rule, Power to Seize Property, Administration of Government Departments, Acting Minister Validity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guenter Zoeller
Applicant
The Honourable Lionel Frost Bowen, Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia
First Respondent
The Honourable Michael John Duffy, Minister of State for Trade Negotiations
Second Respondent
Stanley David Kitchener Hyde, Magistrate
Third Respondent
Kevin Robert Webb, Magistrate
Fourth Respondent
The Federal Republic of Germany
Fifth Respondent
The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
Sixth Respondent
Raymond Carlin
Seventh Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether multiple extradition proceedings are lawful under the Extradition (Foreign States) Act 1966
- 2 Whether the 'speciality' rule was breached
- 3 Whether the second s.15 notice was validly issued by an Acting Minister
Ratio Decidendi
The Extradition (Foreign States) Act 1966 permits multiple extradition proceedings provided each follows the statutory procedure, and the 'speciality' rule is satisfied by undertakings current at the time of surrender. The second s.15 notice was validly executed by an Acting Minister in accordance with s.19 of the Acts Interpretation Act, and the seizure of the applicant's property was unlawful as it occurred before the requisition was made.
Court Disposition
Application partly granted and partly dismissed
Orders
- Declare seizure of applicant's property described in the application for review was unlawful, liberty reserved to applicant for further relief in this connection.
- Proceedings otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment