Gunning Sustainable Development Association Incorporated v Upper Lachlan Council and Anor [2004] NSWLEC 603
Given substantial security has already been provided and evidence that further large orders would permanently stay the proceedings, a further small amount of $5,000 for each Respondent is appropriate, balancing protection of Respondents with potential oppressiveness to Applicant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceedings (judicial Review of Development Consent) / Application for Further Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Applicant ordered to provide further security for costs ($5,000 each Respondent) or proceedings will be stayed; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'public Interest Litigation' 'development Consent' 'environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 S 123']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings (judicial Review of Development Consent) / Application for Further Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether further security for costs should be ordered against applicant' 'Whether the litigation is in the public interest' 'Quantum of security for costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Given substantial security has already been provided and evidence that further large orders would permanently stay the proceedings, a further small amount of $5,000 for each Respondent is appropriate, balancing protection of Respondents with potential oppressiveness to Applicant.
Court Disposition
Applicant ordered to provide further security for costs ($5,000 each Respondent) or proceedings will be stayed; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Applicant to provide additional security for costs to First Respondent: $5,000 by 4 November 2004, satisfactory to Registrar.' 'Applicant to provide additional security for costs to Second Respondent: $5,000 by 4 November 2004, satisfactory to Registrar.' 'If security not provided by 4 November 2004, proceedings...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment