Yu v Wei (No 3) [2021] NSWDC 818
Given the joint representation, related party status between Mr Wei and Top Pacific Group, mixed success on issues, and that no significant exclusive costs can be safely identified, the proper order is no order as to the costs of the first defendant. The circumstances did not justify a departure from this fair outcome.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Guo Jun Yu; First Defendant: Park Zuliang Wei; Second Defendant: Top Pacific Group Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Costs Application
- Outcome
- No order as to the costs of the first defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Party/party, Discretion in Costs Orders, Joint Representation, Multiple Parties, Related Parties in Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guo Jun Yu
Plaintiff
Park Zuliang Wei
First Defendant
Top Pacific Group Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper costs order for first defendant when proceedings involve multiple parties and joint representation
- 2 Whether costs should follow the event per general rule
- 3 Application of exceptions to costs following the event, especially with related parties and shared representation
Ratio Decidendi
Given the joint representation, related party status between Mr Wei and Top Pacific Group, mixed success on issues, and that no significant exclusive costs can be safely identified, the proper order is no order as to the costs of the first defendant. The circumstances did not justify a departure from this fair outcome.
Court Disposition
No order as to the costs of the first defendant.
Orders
- No order as to the costs of the first defendant in the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment