Singh v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2022] NSWSC 78

Singh v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2022] NSWSC 78

Upon sequestration, the plaintiff’s right to sue regarding the costs assessment vested in the trustees, and the plaintiff had no standing to commence or maintain these proceedings. Accordingly, the proceedings must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 February 2022
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application to Dismiss Proceedings for Lack of Standing
Outcome
Proceedings dismissed for lack of standing; plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
Legal Topics
['standing of Bankrupt to Commence Proceedings' 'judicial Review' 'costs Assessment' 'proper Parties to Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application to Dismiss Proceedings for Lack of Standing

  1. 1 ['Whether a bankrupt has standing to commence or maintain judicial review proceedings in relation to a costs assessment review application initiated before sequestration' 'Whether costs assessment proceedings vest in the bankruptcy trustees or the bankrupt' 'Whether certain defendants were properly joined']

Ratio Decidendi

Upon sequestration, the plaintiff’s right to sue regarding the costs assessment vested in the trustees, and the plaintiff had no standing to commence or maintain these proceedings. Accordingly, the proceedings must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Proceedings dismissed for lack of standing; plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.

Orders

  • ['Declare that the plaintiff has no standing to commence or maintain the proceedings.' 'Dismiss the proceedings pursuant to r 13.4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs."]