Singh v Charles [2023] NSWSC 623
The plaintiff and the second and third defendants did not appear, and the proceedings had been reduced to a point where none of the remaining active parties were prepared to take any further step; accordingly, the only course was to dismiss the proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Proceedings / Summary Dismissal / Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Dismissal' 'want of Prosecution' 'non Appearance' 'tenancy Dispute' 'nsw Civil and Administrative Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Proceedings / Summary Dismissal / Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be dismissed for want of prosecution given the apparent lack of interest of all parties in their continuation.' 'Whether any remaining active parties were prepared to take any further step in the proceedings.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff and the second and third defendants did not appear, and the proceedings had been reduced to a point where none of the remaining active parties were prepared to take any further step; accordingly, the only course was to dismiss the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed.
Orders
- ['Proceedings dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment