Singh v Fobupu Pty Ltd, in the matter of Singh [2020] FCA 886
The orders on which the bankruptcy notices were based—namely, the s 78 NCAT certificate and cost determination certificates filed in the Local Court—operate as final judgments for the purposes of s 41 of the Bankruptcy Act. The applicant had no relevant set-off or counter-claim, the judgments are not less final because of pending appeals, there was no relevant defect in the bankruptcy notices, and the identity of creditor as in the judgments was not shown to be in issue. Accordingly, the applications to set aside the bankruptcy notices were dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gurjit Singh; Respondent: Fobupu Pty Ltd; Respondent: Ghulam Akbar Khan; Respondent: Samina Khan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice / Judgment on Applications to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notices
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Notice, Final Judgment, Set Off, Counter Claim, Identity of Creditor, Defect in Bankruptcy Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gurjit Singh
Applicant
Fobupu Pty Ltd
Respondent
Ghulam Akbar Khan
Respondent
Samina Khan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice / Judgment on Applications to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notices
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bankruptcy notices are based on final judgments within the meaning of s 41 of the Bankruptcy Act
- 2 Whether the applicant has a set-off or counter-claim within the meaning of s 40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act
- 3 Whether there are defects in the bankruptcy notices
Ratio Decidendi
The orders on which the bankruptcy notices were based—namely, the s 78 NCAT certificate and cost determination certificates filed in the Local Court—operate as final judgments for the purposes of s 41 of the Bankruptcy Act. The applicant had no relevant set-off or counter-claim, the judgments are not less final because of pending appeals, there was no relevant defect in the bankruptcy notices, and the identity of creditor as in the judgments was not shown to be in issue. Accordingly, the applications to set aside the bankruptcy notices were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- The application in NSD 1916 of 2019 be dismissed.
- The applicant (Gurjit Singh) be granted leave to apply for a lump sum costs order within 21 days of the date of the order (NSD 1916/2019).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment