Guthrie v Herbert [1970] HCA 13
There is no point in granting special leave to appeal where the question is solely the meaning of the legislative words and there is no error in the conclusion that a publication emphasizing matters of sex falls within the statute.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Leave to Appeal / Order
- Outcome
- Application for special leave to appeal refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['obscene Publication' 'statutory Interpretation' 'special Leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal / Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Supreme Court of Queensland erred in its construction of the statutory definition of obscene publication in s. 2 of The Vagrants, Gaming and Other Offences Acts, 1931 to 1967 (Qld)' 'Whether there was any material before the magistrate on which he could find that the Aubrey Beardsley print emphasized matters of sex']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no point in granting special leave to appeal where the question is solely the meaning of the legislative words and there is no error in the conclusion that a publication emphasizing matters of sex falls within the statute.
Court Disposition
Application for special leave to appeal refused with costs.
Orders
- ['Application for special leave to appeal refused with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment