Gutteridge Haskins & Davey Pty Limited v Coffs Harbour City Council [1999] NSWLEC 112
The council is not liable for the cost of the interchange works; the works are being funded, designed, and constructed entirely by the RTA. There is no legal or statutory obligation on the council to contribute or reimburse for these works. Therefore, a s94 contribution levied by the council in relation to such works is ultra vires and invalid, as it does not fall within the scope of s94(3) or the regulatory requirements.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['developer Contributions' 's94 Contributions' 'public Amenities' 'local Government Powers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether council can lawfully levy a s94 contribution for works not provided or funded by it under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
The council is not liable for the cost of the interchange works; the works are being funded, designed, and constructed entirely by the RTA. There is no legal or statutory obligation on the council to contribute or reimburse for these works. Therefore, a s94 contribution levied by the council in relation to such works is ultra vires and invalid, as it does not fall within the scope of s94(3) or the regulatory requirements.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal be upheld.' "The question of law—'Is it lawful for the Respondent to prepare a contribution plan pursuant to section 94AB of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 in respect of work not provided by it?'—is answered in the negative." 'Clause 7 of the Council consent of 7 May 1998 be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment