Guy Carpenter & Company Pty Ltd v Grove (No 3) [2011] FCA 1250
The Court determined that the respondents' verified lists comply with Rule 20.17(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 and there is no basis for requiring a more detailed list, so the application was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Guy Carpenter & Company Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Scott Grove; Second Respondent: John Carroll; Third Respondent: Grant Hollyman; Fourth Respondent: Peter Cheeseman; Fifth Respondent: AON Benfield Australia Ltd ACN 003 026 668
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Post Discovery, Determination of Privilege List Detail
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discovery of Documents, Legal Professional Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guy Carpenter & Company Pty Ltd
Applicant
Scott Grove
First Respondent
John Carroll
Second Respondent
Grant Hollyman
Third Respondent
Peter Cheeseman
Fourth Respondent
AON Benfield Australia Ltd ACN 003 026 668
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Post Discovery, Determination of Privilege List Detail
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents should be required to serve a further verified list of documents identifying the nature of the legal advice founding the claim for privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that the respondents' verified lists comply with Rule 20.17(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 and there is no basis for requiring a more detailed list, so the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Paragraph 3 of the applicant's interlocutory application is dismissed.
- The matter is listed from 9.00-10.00 a.m. on Thursday 3 November 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment