GW v Protective Commissioner & Ors [2003] NSWADTAP 61

GW v Protective Commissioner & Ors [2003] NSWADTAP 61

No substantive or procedural error was found in the Tribunal's handling of the financial management order; procedural fairness was afforded; leave to appeal on other grounds was not warranted as no question of law or administrative policy arose.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['financial Management Order' 'appeals Procedure' 'procedural Fairness' 'appointment of Financial Manager']
['guardianship Law' 'mental Health Law' 'administrative Law'] ['financial Management Order' 'appeals Procedure' 'procedural Fairness' 'appointment of Financial Manager']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Guardianship Tribunal committed any error of law in making the financial management order' 'Whether procedural fairness was afforded to GW' 'Whether leave should be granted to appeal on grounds other than a question of law']

Ratio Decidendi

No substantive or procedural error was found in the Tribunal's handling of the financial management order; procedural fairness was afforded; leave to appeal on other grounds was not warranted as no question of law or administrative policy arose.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The decision of the Guardianship Tribunal made on 23 May 2003 is affirmed.' 'Appeal dismissed']