Perman v Wentholt-Dwyer & Anor [2005] NSWSC 168
The plaintiff was entitled to equitable compensation for improvements made in reliance on the defendant's representation; compensation reduced for removed improvements; interest awarded from the date the plaintiff vacated the property; equitable charge imposed to secure payment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- ['proprietary Estoppel' 'equitable Compensation' 'interest' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff is entitled to equitable compensation and an equitable charge based on proprietary estoppel' 'From what date should interest on compensation run' 'Whether compensation should be reduced due to removal of improvements by the plaintiff']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was entitled to equitable compensation for improvements made in reliance on the defendant's representation; compensation reduced for removed improvements; interest awarded from the date the plaintiff vacated the property; equitable charge imposed to secure payment.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- ['Order that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the sum of $23,908.42, including interest to date, together with interest from 16 March 2005 until the date of payment, at the rates prescribed by s95 of the Supreme Court Act.' 'Order that an equitable charge be imposed on the interest of the defendant in the whole of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment