H N Olsen Pty Ltd v Rockdale City Council [2005] NSWLEC 361
Development consent for the funeral parlour is justified subject to conditions limiting operations due to parking and traffic issues; neighbours' cultural sensibilities alone are not sufficient grounds for refusal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Council Refusal of Development Application / Judgment at Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['funeral Parlour Development Application' 'traffic and Parking' 'cultural Sensibilities' 'appeals Against Council Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Council Refusal of Development Application / Judgment at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for a funeral parlour at 2 Shaw Street, Bexley North' 'Whether concerns about feng shui and sensibilities justify refusal' 'Whether parking and traffic impacts warrant refusal or conditional approval']
Ratio Decidendi
Development consent for the funeral parlour is justified subject to conditions limiting operations due to parking and traffic issues; neighbours' cultural sensibilities alone are not sufficient grounds for refusal.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted with conditions
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted for a funeral parlour at 2 Shaw Street, Bexley North, subject to the conditions in annexure A.' 'Exhibits other than exhibits B, C, H, K, N and P may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment