H v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 906
The notice of the delegate's refusal was handed to the applicant on 26 or 27 October 2000, so notification occurred by personal handing rather than by sending a document to an address. Regulation 5.03 therefore did not defer the date of receipt. Even on the latest possible notification date of 27 October 2000, the seven working day period expired at midnight on 7 November 2000. The application lodged on 8 November 2000 was out of time, and the Refugee Review Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Review a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Federal Court Judgment on Application for Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal Jurisdiction' 'time Limit for Application for Review' 'notification of Decision' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Review a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Federal Court Judgment on Application for Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal had jurisdiction to review the delegate's refusal of a protection visa when the review application was lodged on 8 November 2000." "Whether reg 5.03 of the Migration Regulations applied so that notification of the delegate's decision was deemed to be received seven days after the date of the document." 'Whether notification was effected by sending a notice to an address or by handing a notice of the decision to the applicant.' 'How the seven working day period in reg 4.31 was to be computed in the circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
The notice of the delegate's refusal was handed to the applicant on 26 or 27 October 2000, so notification occurred by personal handing rather than by sending a document to an address. Regulation 5.03 therefore did not defer the date of receipt. Even on the latest possible notification date of 27 October 2000, the seven working day period expired at midnight on 7 November 2000. The application lodged on 8 November 2000 was out of time, and the Refugee Review Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The Court record be amended to identify the applicant, in all published documents, only as "H".' 'The application be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment