He v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1167

He v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1167

The applicant showed no basis for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal had considered the applicant's claims, rejected key factual assertions about his political involvement and family consequences, and was satisfied that his claimed activities did not create a real chance of persecution for a Convention reason on return to China. The application was therefore dismissed, with costs ordered against the applicant.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order of Review Pursuant to Part 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa
Outcome
Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs; leave granted to the respondent to file and serve any application for costs against another party within 14 days.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'political Opinion' 'convention Reason' 'third Party Costs']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'refugee Law' 'costs'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'political Opinion' 'convention Reason' 'third Party Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for an Order of Review Pursuant to Part 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether any basis was shown for judicial review of the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision affirming refusal of a protection visa." 'Whether the applicant faced a real chance of persecution for a Convention reason on return to China by reason of claimed political opinion and activities.' "Whether the applicant should pay the respondent's costs and whether the respondent should have leave to consider seeking costs against a third party."]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant showed no basis for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal had considered the applicant's claims, rejected key factual assertions about his political involvement and family consequences, and was satisfied that his claimed activities did not create a real chance of persecution for a Convention reason on return to China. The application was therefore dismissed, with costs ordered against the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs; leave granted to the respondent to file and serve any application for costs against another party within 14 days.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs." 'The respondent be granted leave to file and serve within 14 days any application for costs against any other party he sees fit.' 'Any application for costs against a third party be listed for directions on Thursday 23 August 2001 at...