Hakea Holdings Pty Ltd v McGrath [2021] FCA 660
Leave should be granted to the plaintiff to re-open its case to adduce additional affidavits to prove whether a claim was made on the first defendant within the insurance policy period. The interests of justice favour allowing the application despite the plaintiff's discovery failures as the evidence is already in its possession, the issue is significant for the proceeding, and remedial orders can address additional delay and cost.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure (application to Re Open) / Interlocutory/part Heard
- Outcome
- Leave granted to re-open case (on limited basis).
- Legal Topics
- ['application to Re Open Case' 'admissibility of Additional Affidavits' 'contract of Insurance' 'discovery Obligations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure (application to Re Open) / Interlocutory/part Heard
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the plaintiff to re-open its case to adduce additional affidavit evidence to prove the making of an insurance claim' 'Whether delivery of the 20 January 2017 letter of demand to the first defendant was made within the relevant policy period']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave should be granted to the plaintiff to re-open its case to adduce additional affidavits to prove whether a claim was made on the first defendant within the insurance policy period. The interests of justice favour allowing the application despite the plaintiff's discovery failures as the evidence is already in its possession, the issue is significant for the proceeding, and remedial orders can address additional delay and cost.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to re-open case (on limited basis).
Orders
- ['The parties bring in agreed orders, or failing agreement their respective draft orders, giving effect to these reasons, by 4.00 pm on 25 July 2021.' 'Plaintiff to pay costs of the application to re-open, regardless of result.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment