Regina v Sinanovic [1999] NSWCCA 216

Regina v Sinanovic [1999] NSWCCA 216

Leave to appeal against the interlocutory orders was refused because the District Court and this Court lack power to direct custodial location or legal access, and the circumstances presented did not warrant a stay of proceedings or establish actionable abuse of process.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Hakija Sinanovic
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 May 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Orders
Outcome
Application dismissed. Leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Access in Goal to Assistance, Legal Visits, Abuse of Process, Natural Justice
Criminal Law Stay of Proceedings Access in Goal to Assistance Legal Visits Abuse of Process Natural Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Hakija Sinanovic

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was denied adequate facilities and time to prepare for trial
  2. 2 Whether a stay of proceedings should be granted due to alleged abuse of process or denial of natural justice
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's access to legal assistance (specifically his wife) in custody was unlawfully restricted

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal against the interlocutory orders was refused because the District Court and this Court lack power to direct custodial location or legal access, and the circumstances presented did not warrant a stay of proceedings or establish actionable abuse of process.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed. Leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal refused in each matter.