Regina v Sinanovic [2000] NSWCCA 386

No meritorious grounds for appeal were established; all complaints by the applicant were either not raised at trial, lacked substance or evidentiary basis, and did not demonstrate any miscarriage of justice or procedural unfairness; accordingly, applications for extension of time to appeal against conviction and for leave to appeal against sentence refused.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 10 October 2000
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics: ['obtaining Money by Deception' 'leave to Appeal Out of Time' 'criminal Procedure' 'unmeritorious Appeal']

['criminal Law'] ['obtaining Money by Deception' 'leave to Appeal Out of Time' 'criminal Procedure' 'unmeritorious Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether leave to appeal out of time against conviction should be granted' 'Whether leave to appeal against sentence should be granted' 'Whether there was a miscarriage of justice at trial']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

['Application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed' 'Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed']