Halcyon Hotels Pty Ltd (93 124 421 199) v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2022] NSWLEC 1221
Because the parties reached agreement to uphold the appeal and grant consent subject to conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the jurisdictional prerequisites had been met and that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application Da20/1400 / Final Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'mixed Use Development' 'permissibility Under Local Environmental Plan' 'conservation Incentives' 'sydney Drinking Water Catchment' 'koala Habitat Protection' 'traffic Generating Development' 'contaminated Land Remediation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application Da20/1400 / Final Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court was required under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement." 'Whether the jurisdictional prerequisites for granting development consent to the proposed mixed use re-development were satisfied.' 'Whether the proposed development was permissible, including by reliance on cl 5.10(10) of the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010 for otherwise prohibited uses.' 'Whether relevant statutory planning, environmental, bush fire, water, biodiversity, koala habitat, contamination, transport and regional development requirements were satisfied.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement to uphold the appeal and grant consent subject to conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the jurisdictional prerequisites had been met and that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to amend its Class 1 Application form in accordance with Annexure \'A\' to this judgment, and to rely upon its amended Application in the proceedings including changing the Applicant\'s name to "Halcyon Hotels Pty Ltd (93 124 421 199)".' 'The appeal is upheld.' "Concept development...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment