KHAN v POLYZOIS (NO 2) [2006] NSWCA 225
The respondent's motion was dismissed because (1) the matter was expressly conducted and determined on the agreed basis that s151Z(1) did not apply, confirmed by transcript; and (2) on the facts, s151Z(1) was inapplicable as the doctor's liability for failure to treat was not 'in respect of the same injury' as the original workplace injury for compensation purposes.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hamid KHAN; Respondent: John POLYZOIS
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Motion
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Judgments, Slip Rule, Workers Compensation Reduction, Double Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hamid KHAN
Appellant
John POLYZOIS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court can vary or set aside final orders under the slip rule or other principle after judgment was entered when parties conducted appeal on agreed basis that s151Z(1) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 would not apply
- 2 Whether s151Z(1) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 applied to require a reduction or other adjustment in the verdict
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's motion was dismissed because (1) the matter was expressly conducted and determined on the agreed basis that s151Z(1) did not apply, confirmed by transcript; and (2) on the facts, s151Z(1) was inapplicable as the doctor's liability for failure to treat was not 'in respect of the same injury' as the original workplace injury for compensation purposes.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Motion dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment