Hampden Press Pty Ltd and anor v Cramond Publications Pty Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 99
The applicants established that the contract was within jurisdiction, work was performed, and the evidence was uncontested. Variation of the contract and judgment for commission and expenses were ordered due to respondent's failure to appear and proper service.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Ex Parte Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. Contract varied. Judgment for commission and expenses. Indemnity costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Contract' 'variation of Contract' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Ex Parte Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the contract between the parties was unfair in the statutory sense under s106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996' 'Whether a variation is required to make express provision for payment of commission and expenses' 'Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants established that the contract was within jurisdiction, work was performed, and the evidence was uncontested. Variation of the contract and judgment for commission and expenses were ordered due to respondent's failure to appear and proper service.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Contract varied. Judgment for commission and expenses. Indemnity costs ordered.
Orders
- ['Order for variation of contract as per paragraph 3(a) of the summons' 'Judgment in the sum of $3,312.85 for commission and expenses' 'Order for costs on an indemnity basis in the sum of $6,112']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment