Hanave Pty Ltd v Nomad Sydney Pty Ltd (formerly Wine Nomad Pty Ltd) (No. 2) [2023] NSWSC 533

Hanave Pty Ltd v Nomad Sydney Pty Ltd (formerly Wine Nomad Pty Ltd) (No. 2) [2023] NSWSC 533

The appropriate costs order is that the defendant pay 95% of the plaintiff's costs, reflecting the overall success of the plaintiff while acknowledging a limited separable issue (ground 7) on which the defendant succeeded, thus warranting a 5% reduction in recoverable costs.

Parties
Plaintiff: Hanave Pty Ltd; Defendant: Nomad Sydney Pty Ltd (formerly Wine Nomad Pty Ltd)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Procedural Rulings / Variation of Costs Order Following Judgment
Outcome
Order 8 made on 24 March 2023 varied.
Legal Topics
Costs, Apportionment of Costs, Calderbank Offers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hanave Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Nomad Sydney Pty Ltd (formerly Wine Nomad Pty Ltd)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Procedural Rulings / Variation of Costs Order Following Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant bettered the terms in its Calderbank offer and costs should be apportioned accordingly
  2. 2 Whether costs should be apportioned reflecting successes and failures of parties on particular issues
  3. 3 Whether reservation or apportionment of costs regarding specific issues is warranted

Ratio Decidendi

The appropriate costs order is that the defendant pay 95% of the plaintiff's costs, reflecting the overall success of the plaintiff while acknowledging a limited separable issue (ground 7) on which the defendant succeeded, thus warranting a 5% reduction in recoverable costs.

Court Disposition

Order 8 made on 24 March 2023 varied.

Orders

  • Order the defendant to pay 95% of the plaintiff's costs of the proceeding in this Court.