Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 447
The application failed as civil engineering justification for fender piles was not sufficient under DCPWD cl 10.1(f), fender piles would adversely affect scenic value and character, and approval would set an undesirable precedent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 96(6) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'modification Consent' 'waterfront Development' 'visual Impact' 'precedent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 96(6) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether civil engineering justification for fender piles is sufficient under DCPWD cl 10.1(f)' 'Whether proposed fender piles adversely impact scenic value and character of the waterfront' 'Whether approval would set undesirable precedent' 'Whether modification is of minimal environmental impact']
Ratio Decidendi
The application failed as civil engineering justification for fender piles was not sufficient under DCPWD cl 10.1(f), fender piles would adversely affect scenic value and character, and approval would set an undesirable precedent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal under s 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is dismissed.' 'Modification application No MA 05/0174 to modify development application No 05/0364 to delete Condition 4 and to erect two fender piles adjacent to No 43 Harrow Street, Sylvania is refused consent.' 'The exhibits except...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment