Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 447

Harbour Port Constructions Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 447

The application failed as civil engineering justification for fender piles was not sufficient under DCPWD cl 10.1(f), fender piles would adversely affect scenic value and character, and approval would set an undesirable precedent.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 96(6) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'modification Consent' 'waterfront Development' 'visual Impact' 'precedent']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under S 96(6) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether civil engineering justification for fender piles is sufficient under DCPWD cl 10.1(f)' 'Whether proposed fender piles adversely impact scenic value and character of the waterfront' 'Whether approval would set undesirable precedent' 'Whether modification is of minimal environmental impact']

Ratio Decidendi

The application failed as civil engineering justification for fender piles was not sufficient under DCPWD cl 10.1(f), fender piles would adversely affect scenic value and character, and approval would set an undesirable precedent.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal under s 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is dismissed.' 'Modification application No MA 05/0174 to modify development application No 05/0364 to delete Condition 4 and to erect two fender piles adjacent to No 43 Harrow Street, Sylvania is refused consent.' 'The exhibits except...