Day v Harness Racing New South Wales [2015] NSWSC 836
There is room for argument on whether the media releases convey guilt or suspicion and, on balance, the pleaded imputations should go to the jury; objections as to capacity and substance of imputations are rejected.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Ruling on Objections to Pleadings
- Outcome
- Objections to capacity and substance of pleaded imputations rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['pleadings' 'rulings on Imputations' 'capacity' 'requirement That Imputations Differ in Substance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Ruling on Objections to Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the pleaded imputations have capacity to be taken as imputations of guilt or suspicion.' 'Whether imputations (b) and (c) differ in substance as required by r 14.30 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).' 'Adequacy of pleading republications as separate causes of action.']
Ratio Decidendi
There is room for argument on whether the media releases convey guilt or suspicion and, on balance, the pleaded imputations should go to the jury; objections as to capacity and substance of imputations are rejected.
Court Disposition
Objections to capacity and substance of pleaded imputations rejected.
Orders
- ['The plaintiffs are permitted to rely on all pleaded imputations and are not put to an election between imputations (b) and (c).' 'No ruling required regarding pleading of republications.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment