Day v Harness Racing New South Wales [2015] NSWSC 836

Day v Harness Racing New South Wales [2015] NSWSC 836

There is room for argument on whether the media releases convey guilt or suspicion and, on balance, the pleaded imputations should go to the jury; objections as to capacity and substance of imputations are rejected.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 April 2015
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Ruling on Objections to Pleadings
Outcome
Objections to capacity and substance of pleaded imputations rejected.
Legal Topics
['pleadings' 'rulings on Imputations' 'capacity' 'requirement That Imputations Differ in Substance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Defamation / Ruling on Objections to Pleadings

  1. 1 ['Whether the pleaded imputations have capacity to be taken as imputations of guilt or suspicion.' 'Whether imputations (b) and (c) differ in substance as required by r 14.30 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).' 'Adequacy of pleading republications as separate causes of action.']

Ratio Decidendi

There is room for argument on whether the media releases convey guilt or suspicion and, on balance, the pleaded imputations should go to the jury; objections as to capacity and substance of imputations are rejected.

Court Disposition

Objections to capacity and substance of pleaded imputations rejected.

Orders

  • ['The plaintiffs are permitted to rely on all pleaded imputations and are not put to an election between imputations (b) and (c).' 'No ruling required regarding pleading of republications.']