Love, H. v. Desmone (Des) Williams & Ors [1994] FCA 984

Love, H. v. Desmone (Des) Williams & Ors [1994] FCA 984

Special circumstances exist, as the applicants facilitated a novel forensic process in electoral litigation which had a wider impact than only the parties, sufficiently justifying indemnity costs for the main proceedings.

Parties
Applicant: Harold Love; Respondents: Desmone (Des) Williams & Others; Applicant/petitioner/respondent (in Various Matters): Australian Electoral Commission; Respondents / Applicants: Rodney Glenn Towney & Others; Respondents: Fourth, Sixth, Tenth and Eleventh Respondents
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 December 1994
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion Relating to Costs in Election Petition Proceedings / Post Trial Costs Determination
Outcome
Orders for costs as follows: Indemnity costs to applicants in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94; costs of the motion on party and party basis in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94; no order as to costs in NG 104/94.
Legal Topics
Indemnity Costs, Test Case Principles, Public Interest Litigation, Discretion to Depart From Party and Party Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harold Love

Applicant

Desmone (Des) Williams & Others

Respondents

Australian Electoral Commission

Applicant/petitioner/respondent (in Various Matters)

Rodney Glenn Towney & Others

Respondents / Applicants

Fourth, Sixth, Tenth and Eleventh Respondents

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion Relating to Costs in Election Petition Proceedings / Post Trial Costs Determination

  1. 1 Whether special circumstances justify indemnity costs in electoral petitions involving novel procedures and public interest elements
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings are sufficiently in the nature of a test case to warrant indemnity costs

Ratio Decidendi

Special circumstances exist, as the applicants facilitated a novel forensic process in electoral litigation which had a wider impact than only the parties, sufficiently justifying indemnity costs for the main proceedings.

Court Disposition

Orders for costs as follows: Indemnity costs to applicants in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94; costs of the motion on party and party basis in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94; no order as to costs in NG 104/94.

Orders

  • Australian Electoral Commission to pay the Applicants' costs in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94 as taxed or assessed on an indemnity basis, except in so far as costs are unreasonable in amount or unreasonably incurred.
  • Australian Electoral Commission to pay the Applicants' costs of this motion in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94 on the party and party basis.