Love, H. v. Desmone (Des) Williams & Ors [1994] FCA 984
Special circumstances exist, as the applicants facilitated a novel forensic process in electoral litigation which had a wider impact than only the parties, sufficiently justifying indemnity costs for the main proceedings.
- Parties
- Applicant: Harold Love; Respondents: Desmone (Des) Williams & Others; Applicant/petitioner/respondent (in Various Matters): Australian Electoral Commission; Respondents / Applicants: Rodney Glenn Towney & Others; Respondents: Fourth, Sixth, Tenth and Eleventh Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion Relating to Costs in Election Petition Proceedings / Post Trial Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Orders for costs as follows: Indemnity costs to applicants in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94; costs of the motion on party and party basis in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94; no order as to costs in NG 104/94.
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Costs, Test Case Principles, Public Interest Litigation, Discretion to Depart From Party and Party Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harold Love
Applicant
Desmone (Des) Williams & Others
Respondents
Australian Electoral Commission
Applicant/petitioner/respondent (in Various Matters)
Rodney Glenn Towney & Others
Respondents / Applicants
Fourth, Sixth, Tenth and Eleventh Respondents
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion Relating to Costs in Election Petition Proceedings / Post Trial Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether special circumstances justify indemnity costs in electoral petitions involving novel procedures and public interest elements
- 2 Whether the proceedings are sufficiently in the nature of a test case to warrant indemnity costs
Ratio Decidendi
Special circumstances exist, as the applicants facilitated a novel forensic process in electoral litigation which had a wider impact than only the parties, sufficiently justifying indemnity costs for the main proceedings.
Court Disposition
Orders for costs as follows: Indemnity costs to applicants in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94; costs of the motion on party and party basis in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94; no order as to costs in NG 104/94.
Orders
- Australian Electoral Commission to pay the Applicants' costs in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94 as taxed or assessed on an indemnity basis, except in so far as costs are unreasonable in amount or unreasonably incurred.
- Australian Electoral Commission to pay the Applicants' costs of this motion in NG 98/94 and NG 102/94 on the party and party basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment