Singh v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2009] FCA 508
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because there was no practical utility; the Federal Magistrates Court was willing to entertain an application to reinstate the reinstatement application and setting aside the order would achieve no more.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'reinstatement of Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is there practical utility in granting leave to appeal the dismissal of the reinstatement application?' 'Is the Federal Magistrates Court willing to hear an application to reinstate the reinstatement application?']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because there was no practical utility; the Federal Magistrates Court was willing to entertain an application to reinstate the reinstatement application and setting aside the order would achieve no more.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the second respondent's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment