HARRIS V. THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

HARRIS V. THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Plaintiff failed to establish by evidence that the driver of the truck was negligent or had breached a duty of care, as there was no proof the driver knew of or should have anticipated the dangerous position of the plaintiff or that the manner of driving was negligent under the circumstances.

Parties
Plaintiff: Harris; Defendant: The Commonwealth
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 November 1945
Procedural Posture
Action Under the National Security (claims Against the Commonwealth in Relation to Visiting Forces) Regulations / Trial Judgment
Outcome
Judgment of non-suit entered for the Commonwealth with costs.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Claims Against Commonwealth, Visiting Forces
Tort Law Military Law Negligence Duty of Care Claims Against Commonwealth Visiting Forces

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harris

Plaintiff

The Commonwealth

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Action Under the National Security (claims Against the Commonwealth in Relation to Visiting Forces) Regulations / Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the driver of the army truck was negligent and thereby liable for the plaintiff's injuries under the applicable regulations.

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff failed to establish by evidence that the driver of the truck was negligent or had breached a duty of care, as there was no proof the driver knew of or should have anticipated the dangerous position of the plaintiff or that the manner of driving was negligent under the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Judgment of non-suit entered for the Commonwealth with costs.

Orders

  • Judgment of non-suit for the Commonwealth
  • Plaintiff to pay the costs