R v Bragias [2016] NSWCCA 219
The conviction was not unreasonable because the complainant's and Ms McMahon's police statements, admitted for their truth, gave a coherent and realistic account of an assault and taking of the car, corroborated by the complainant's immediate SMS messages, prompt complaint, visible distress, injury recorded by police and ambulance officers, hospital treatment, and other evidence. The admitted lie about Mr Thornton's presence had a plausible explanation and did not undermine the compelling core account. The alternative collateral account was open to rejection, and the jury also had an advantage in assessing the witnesses' demeanour and claimed amnesia. The Court was not persuaded that the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Conviction Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction in the Court of Criminal Appeal From the District Court of NSW
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['conviction Appeal' 'unreasonable Verdict' 'taking a Motor Vehicle With Assault' 'assessment of Witness Credibility' 'prior Statements Admitted for Truth' 'jury Advantage in Seeing and Hearing Witnesses']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Conviction Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction in the Court of Criminal Appeal From the District Court of NSW
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the verdict of guilty of taking a motor vehicle with assault was unreasonable, or could not be supported, having regard to the evidence.' "Whether the complainant's admitted lies and claimed amnesia, and the claimed amnesia of his girlfriend, made the Crown case unsafe." "Whether the jury's advantage in seeing and hearing witnesses affected the appellate assessment of the evidence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was not unreasonable because the complainant's and Ms McMahon's police statements, admitted for their truth, gave a coherent and realistic account of an assault and taking of the car, corroborated by the complainant's immediate SMS messages, prompt complaint, visible distress, injury recorded by police and ambulance officers, hospital treatment, and other evidence. The admitted lie about Mr Thornton's presence had a plausible explanation and did not undermine the compelling core account. The alternative collateral account was open to rejection, and the jury also had an advantage in assessing the witnesses' demeanour and claimed amnesia. The Court was not persuaded that the...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment