Lansen v Northern Territory of Australia [2016] FCA 567
The Court is satisfied on the evidence that the original applicant is deceased and the Replacement Applicants have been properly authorised by the claim group. It is therefore appropriate to exercise the discretion under s 66B to replace the applicant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Application / Interlocutory Application to Replace Applicant Under S 66 B
- Outcome
- Application granted: Replacement Applicants to replace original applicant; heading of the claimant application to be amended accordingly.
- Legal Topics
- ['replacement of Applicant' 'interlocutory Applications' 'claim Group Authorisation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Application / Interlocutory Application to Replace Applicant Under S 66 B
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should order replacement of the deceased original applicant pursuant to s 66B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)' 'Whether the replacement applicants were properly authorised by the claim group']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court is satisfied on the evidence that the original applicant is deceased and the Replacement Applicants have been properly authorised by the claim group. It is therefore appropriate to exercise the discretion under s 66B to replace the applicant.
Court Disposition
Application granted: Replacement Applicants to replace original applicant; heading of the claimant application to be amended accordingly.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 66B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), Asman Rory, Christopher Pluto and Tom Hume replace the current Applicant in the proceedings.' 'The heading of the claimant application be amended to reflect the names of the Replacement Applicants.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment