Miller v Chapman [2001] FCA 105

Miller v Chapman [2001] FCA 105

Institute of Taxation Research Pty Ltd actively directed and promoted the pursuit of claims in the applicant's name that had no prospect of success, in full knowledge or reckless disregard of that fact, constituting an abuse of process and justifying an order for indemnity costs in favour of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Application Challenging Taxation Assessments / Judgment on Costs After Dismissal of Substantive Application
Outcome
Application dismissed. Costs ordered against Institute of Taxation Research Pty Ltd on an indemnity basis in favour of Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.
Legal Topics
['tax Assessment Challenge' 'joinder for Costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'abuse of Process']
['taxation Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['tax Assessment Challenge' 'joinder for Costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'abuse of Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Challenging Taxation Assessments / Judgment on Costs After Dismissal of Substantive Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether costs should be awarded against a joined party (Institute of Taxation Research Pty Ltd) on an indemnity basis for its role in foredoomed legal proceedings against the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation' 'Whether the involvement of Institute of Taxation Research Pty Ltd in advising and directing the applicant amounted to an abuse of process by causing the applicant to pursue claims with no real prospect of success']

Ratio Decidendi

Institute of Taxation Research Pty Ltd actively directed and promoted the pursuit of claims in the applicant's name that had no prospect of success, in full knowledge or reckless disregard of that fact, constituting an abuse of process and justifying an order for indemnity costs in favour of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed. Costs ordered against Institute of Taxation Research Pty Ltd on an indemnity basis in favour of Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.

Orders

  • ['The second respondent, Institute of Taxation Research Pty Ltd, pay to the first respondent, the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, costs of the application to be taxed on an indemnity basis, excepting costs unreasonably incurred or unreasonable in amount.']