Taybah v R [2024] NSWCCA 182
The sentencing judge did not fail to have regard to relevant matters in evaluating objective seriousness, including submissions about the applicant's role and motivation. There was no evidence the applicant withdrew from the arrangement, nor that his possession was highly reluctant. The findings regarding his role...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Hassan Taybah; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; extension of time and leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Objective Seriousness, Supplying Prohibited Drugs, Proceeds of Crime
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hassan Taybah
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to have regard to critical matters in evaluating objective seriousness
- 2 Whether applicant had withdrawn from the arrangement to possess/store drugs and money
- 3 Whether applicant's possession of drugs and money was 'highly reluctant'
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not fail to have regard to relevant matters in evaluating objective seriousness, including submissions about the applicant's role and motivation. There was no evidence the applicant withdrew from the arrangement, nor that his possession was highly reluctant. The findings regarding his role and culpability were open on the evidence, and no error was demonstrated.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; extension of time and leave to appeal granted
Orders
- Extend time for filing the present application to 1 July 2024.
- Grant leave to appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment