Hastings Capital Australia Pty Ltd v Booth [2022] NSWSC 892

The notice of motion was dismissed because Alan Munro was no longer a party to the proceedings and had no interest in the land subject to the writ of possession, so he lacked standing to bring the stay application.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 16 June 2022
Procedural Posture: Notice of Motion Seeking Stay of Execution of Writ of Possession / Duty List Procedural Ruling After Default Judgment and Order for Possession of Land
Outcome: The notice of motion is dismissed.
Legal Topics: ['writ of Possession' 'stay of Execution' 'standing' 'mortgage' 'default Judgment' 'costs']

['land Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['writ of Possession' 'stay of Execution' 'standing' 'mortgage' 'default Judgment' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion Seeking Stay of Execution of Writ of Possession / Duty List Procedural Ruling After Default Judgment and Order for Possession of Land

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether Alan Munro had standing to seek a stay of execution of a writ of possession where he was no longer a party to the proceedings and had no interest in the land subject to the writ.' 'Whether the notice of motion seeking a stay of the writ of possession should be dismissed.']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

The notice of motion is dismissed.

Orders

['The notice of motion is dismissed.' "Alan Munro, who brings the notice of motion, is to pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion."]