Haven Place Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2024] NSWLEC 1764
The Court was satisfied that the applicant's written requests pursuant to cl 4.6 of the KLEP adequately justified variations to the building height and floor space ratio development standards, that all jurisdictional requirements were met, and consent should be granted to the amended DA subject to conditions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Haven Place Pty Ltd ATF Haven Place Unit Trust; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Final Orders After Contested Conciliation; Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; consent granted
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Variation of Development Standards, Residential Apartment Building, Ku Ring Gai Local Environmental Plan 2015, Height of Buildings, Floor Space Ratio, Appeal Process, Public Submissions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haven Place Pty Ltd ATF Haven Place Unit Trust
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Orders After Contested Conciliation; Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend Development Application DA0195/23
- 2 Whether the written requests to vary development standards for building height (cl 4.3) and floor space ratio (cl 4.4) under cl 4.6 of the KLEP should be upheld
- 3 Whether consent should be granted to the amended development application for a five-storey residential apartment building at 6-8 Newhaven Place, St Ives
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the applicant's written requests pursuant to cl 4.6 of the KLEP adequately justified variations to the building height and floor space ratio development standards, that all jurisdictional requirements were met, and consent should be granted to the amended DA subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; consent granted
Orders
- Leave granted to amend DA0195/23 and rely on updated plans and documents per Condition 1 at Annexure A.
- Applicant’s cl 4.6 written request to vary building height (cl 4.3, KLEP) is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment