Havenland Pty Ltd v Blue Mountains City Council [2000] NSWLEC 13
The modifications were granted because the evidence showed that Condition 16 had never been fulfilled, the residents were largely of modest or pensioner means, they were otherwise reasonably catered for, and it would not be reasonable in the existing circumstances to require management to provide the services originally imposed. The same reasoning supported acceptance of the reduced substitute obligation in proposed Condition 17, and the proposed Condition 14 was accepted as a substitute emergency alarm system condition.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Development Consent Modification / Amended Notice of Motion Seeking Court Approval to Modify Development Consent
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'conditions of Consent' "aged Persons' Housing Development" 'emergency Alarm System' 'central Amenities Building and Resident Services']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Consent Modification / Amended Notice of Motion Seeking Court Approval to Modify Development Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should approve modifications to Conditions 14, 16 and 17 of the 1983 development consent for an aged persons' residential development at Lalor Drive, Springwood." 'Whether Condition 16, requiring a kiosk or shop and provision of one full meal per day at reasonable cost to residents requiring it because of sickness or disability, should be deleted in light of existing circumstances.' 'Whether a reduced substitute obligation under proposed new Condition 17 was appropriate in the circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
The modifications were granted because the evidence showed that Condition 16 had never been fulfilled, the residents were largely of modest or pensioner means, they were otherwise reasonably catered for, and it would not be reasonable in the existing circumstances to require management to provide the services originally imposed. The same reasoning supported acceptance of the reduced substitute obligation in proposed Condition 17, and the proposed Condition 14 was accepted as a substitute emergency alarm system condition.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['The modifications sought in the amended Notice of Motion filed in Court were granted.' 'The exhibits tendered in support of the application shall remain on the Court file.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment