Eden v R [2023] NSWCCA 31
No miscarriage of justice occurred by reason of the sentencing judge not having Dr Berry's report on FASD, as the evidence did not show material impact on the assessment of objective seriousness or moral culpability, and could have undermined the applicant's case for rehabilitation.; The appeal was therefore dismissed, with leave to appeal granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Application for Leave to Adduce New Evidence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'admission of Fresh/new Evidence' 'foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (fasd)' 'objective Seriousness' 'moral Culpability' 'deterrence' 'miscarriage of Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Application for Leave to Adduce New Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a miscarriage of justice occurred because evidence that the applicant suffers from Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) was not before the sentencing judge' 'Whether new evidence should be admitted on appeal to avoid miscarriage of justice' 'Whether FASD impacted the objective seriousness and assessment of sentence']
Ratio Decidendi
No miscarriage of justice occurred by reason of the sentencing judge not having Dr Berry's report on FASD, as the evidence did not show material impact on the assessment of objective seriousness or moral culpability, and could have undermined the applicant's case for rehabilitation.; The appeal was therefore dismissed, with leave to appeal granted.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment