McRae v R [2023] NSWCCA 55
Leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed because the challenged findings about the applicant opening bank accounts and transferring or authorising transfers were open on the evidence and available inferences, the sentencing judge did not conflate the applicant's role with co-offenders or higher-level participants, and the applicant did not demonstrate that the sentence was manifestly excessive.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['dealing With Proceeds of Crime' 'money Laundering' 'recklessness as to Proceeds of Crime' 'property Reasonably Suspected to Be Proceeds of Crime' 'objective Seriousness' 'manifest Excess' 'factual Findings on Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessing the role of the applicant, including by having undue regard to the activities of co-offenders.' 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed because the challenged findings about the applicant opening bank accounts and transferring or authorising transfers were open on the evidence and available inferences, the sentencing judge did not conflate the applicant's role with co-offenders or higher-level participants, and the applicant did not demonstrate that the sentence was manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is granted.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment