Vasa v Ubiparipovic & Anor [2017] NSWDC 269
The plaintiff suffered musculo-ligamentous injuries to her neck, both shoulders and lower back, with consequent physical and psychological disabilities including morbid obesity, caused or materially contributed to by the admitted negligence of the defendants. These disabilities, together with educational and motivational disruption, have led to quantifiable losses in future earning capacity, treatment needs, and domestic assistance. In the face of uncertainties due to age, buffer sums are appropriate for those heads, based on credible plaintiff evidence, expert medical support (preferencing Dr Habib and Dr Bodel over Dr Gibson/Myers), and causative links supported by contemporaneous and...
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hazel Vasa; First Defendant: Jadranka Ubiparipovic; Second Defendant: DJ Construction & Rendering Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Hearing on Damages
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff—damages assessed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence—liability Admitted, Damages—economic Loss Assessment, Assessment of Medical Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hazel Vasa
Plaintiff
Jadranka Ubiparipovic
First Defendant
DJ Construction & Rendering Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Hearing on Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 What injuries did the plaintiff sustain in the motor vehicle collision?
- 2 What are the ongoing effects and disabilities arising from those injuries?
- 3 What is the proper assessment of damages including economic loss, treatment, and domestic assistance?
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff suffered musculo-ligamentous injuries to her neck, both shoulders and lower back, with consequent physical and psychological disabilities including morbid obesity, caused or materially contributed to by the admitted negligence of the defendants. These disabilities, together with educational and motivational disruption, have led to quantifiable losses in future earning capacity, treatment needs, and domestic assistance. In the face of uncertainties due to age, buffer sums are appropriate for those heads, based on credible plaintiff evidence, expert medical support (preferencing Dr Habib and Dr Bodel over Dr Gibson/Myers), and causative links supported by contemporaneous and...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff—damages assessed
Orders
- Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $125,008.25;
- The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment