R v HD [2017] NSWSC 1756
Although the period of pre-trial detention was lengthy and amounted to a change of circumstances allowing a further application, the risks associated with potential further serious offences, risk to the victim, and community safety concerns could not be ameliorated by the proposed bail conditions. The applicant failed to show cause why detention was not justified. Consequently, the application was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Application for Bail Following Initial Refusal; Consideration of Further Application Under S 74 Bail Act 2013
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['bail Application' 'show Cause Offences' 'assessment of Strength of Crown Case']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Application for Bail Following Initial Refusal; Consideration of Further Application Under S 74 Bail Act 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant has established grounds for a further bail application under s 74 of the Bail Act 2013' 'Whether applicant can show cause why detention is not justified for show cause offences under s 16B Bail Act 2013' 'Whether unacceptable risks justify continued detention']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the period of pre-trial detention was lengthy and amounted to a change of circumstances allowing a further application, the risks associated with potential further serious offences, risk to the victim, and community safety concerns could not be ameliorated by the proposed bail conditions. The applicant failed to show cause why detention was not justified. Consequently, the application was refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- ['Application for bail dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment