In Re Dr Peter Keith [2007] NSWMT 12

In Re Dr Peter Keith [2007] NSWMT 12

Dr Keith engaged in professional misconduct by repeatedly prescribing Schedule 4 and 8 drugs to known or likely drug-dependent patients, often without proper authority, inadequate management, or appropriate record-keeping, thereby falling significantly below accepted professional standards. Overall protection of the public is adequately achieved by imposing conditions on his practice and removing his ability to prescribe controlled drugs for a period, rather than deregistration.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings / Final Judgment and Orders
Outcome
Professional misconduct established; fine and conditions imposed; not deregistered or suspended.
Legal Topics
['professional Misconduct' 'medical Regulation' 'prescription Guidelines' 'drugs of Addiction' 'schedule 4 and Schedule 8 Drugs' 'medical Practice Act Compliance']
['health Law' 'professional Discipline'] ['professional Misconduct' 'medical Regulation' 'prescription Guidelines' 'drugs of Addiction' 'schedule 4 and Schedule 8 Drugs' 'medical Practice Act Compliance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Medical Disciplinary Proceedings / Final Judgment and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Dr Keith was guilty of professional misconduct by prescribing benzodiazepines and Pethidine to drug-dependent patients in inappropriate circumstances, including without authority and in breach of legislation' 'Whether conditions or deregistration should be imposed as orders for the protection of the public']

Ratio Decidendi

Dr Keith engaged in professional misconduct by repeatedly prescribing Schedule 4 and 8 drugs to known or likely drug-dependent patients, often without proper authority, inadequate management, or appropriate record-keeping, thereby falling significantly below accepted professional standards. Overall protection of the public is adequately achieved by imposing conditions on his practice and removing his ability to prescribe controlled drugs for a period, rather than deregistration.

Court Disposition

Professional misconduct established; fine and conditions imposed; not deregistered or suspended.

Orders

  • ['Dr Keith fined $20,000 for professional misconduct (1998-2003).' "Conditions imposed on Dr Keith's practice: completion of education/training on Schedule 4, 4D, and 8 drugs and recordkeeping to NSW Medical Board satisfaction; mandatory counselling with psychiatrist regarding prescribing and managing addicted...