Health Care Complaints Commission v Benness [2024] NSWCATOD 133
Dr Benness engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct by touching two patients' breasts without adequate informed consent or clinical justification during urogynaecological consultations. While serious, the conduct did not amount to improper or unethical conduct or professional misconduct, warranting a caution and educational/protective conditions rather than a permanent reprimand.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Proceedings / Protective Orders Following Findings of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
- Outcome
- Practitioner cautioned and conditions imposed on practice; costs ordered against Practitioner
- Legal Topics
- ['medical Practitioner Regulation' 'informed Consent' 'professional Standards' 'protective Orders' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Proceedings / Protective Orders Following Findings of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Dr Benness engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct by touching patients' breasts without consent or clinical reason during consultations" 'What protective orders or conditions should be imposed in the public interest']
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Benness engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct by touching two patients' breasts without adequate informed consent or clinical justification during urogynaecological consultations. While serious, the conduct did not amount to improper or unethical conduct or professional misconduct, warranting a caution and educational/protective conditions rather than a permanent reprimand.
Court Disposition
Practitioner cautioned and conditions imposed on practice; costs ordered against Practitioner
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s149A(1)(a) of the National Law the Practitioner is cautioned.' 'The Practitioner is to conduct breast examination only in accordance with the RANZCOG Best Practice Guidelines for gynaecological examinations and procedures.' 'The Practitioner is to provide the name of a peer to be approved by the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment