In Re Dr Anthony MICHAEL [2004] NSWMT 12
The Tribunal found all complaints proved and determined that Dr Michael engaged in professional misconduct through repeated breaches of practice conditions, self-administration and fraudulent procurement of drugs, and impairment by addiction, justifying removal from the Register and imposing a two-year prohibition on reapplication.
- Parties
- Applicant: Health Care Complaints Commission; Respondent: Dr Anthony Michael
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Misconduct / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Dr Michael found guilty of professional misconduct; removed from Register; two-year period imposed before reapplication; ordered to pay costs.
- Legal Topics
- Professional Misconduct, Deregistration, Drug Impairment, Breach of Practice Conditions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Health Care Complaints Commission
Applicant
Dr Anthony Michael
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Professional Misconduct / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Anthony Michael engaged in professional misconduct under the Medical Practice Act 1992 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the respondent suffers impairment affecting his capacity to practise medicine
- 3 Appropriate period before reapplication for registration
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found all complaints proved and determined that Dr Michael engaged in professional misconduct through repeated breaches of practice conditions, self-administration and fraudulent procurement of drugs, and impairment by addiction, justifying removal from the Register and imposing a two-year prohibition on reapplication.
Court Disposition
Dr Michael found guilty of professional misconduct; removed from Register; two-year period imposed before reapplication; ordered to pay costs.
Orders
- The name of Anthony Michael be removed from the Register of Medical Practitioners.
- Pursuant to section 64(3) of the Medical Practice Act 1992, no application for review of this order may be made for a period of two years from this date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment