Health Care Complaints Commission v Dr Maendel [2013] NSWMT 3
Complaints One and Two were established because the respondent failed to pursue appropriate investigative and proactive management, failed to ensure appropriate monitoring and reassessment, failed to obtain a CT scan or independent medical opinion, gave advice to the patient's proxy that was flawed by the absence of proper investigation, and failed to keep proper records. Complaint Three was not established because, applying the Briginshaw approach and evaluating the overall circumstances, the Tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent's conduct was sufficiently serious to amount to professional misconduct: he acted honestly and in what he perceived to be his mother's best interests...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Disciplinary Complaint Concerning a Medical Practitioner / Determination of Whether Complaints Were Established; Protective Orders Deferred
- Outcome
- Complaints One and Two established; Complaint Three not established; matter stood over for consideration of protective orders; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['unsatisfactory Professional Conduct' 'professional Misconduct' 'treatment of Family Member by Medical Practitioner' 'palliative Care' 'failure to Refer for CT Scan, Hospitalisation and Specialist Opinion' 'medical Record Keeping' 'briginshaw Standard']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Disciplinary Complaint Concerning a Medical Practitioner / Determination of Whether Complaints Were Established; Protective Orders Deferred
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent's treatment and management of his mother after her collapse amounted to unsatisfactory professional conduct under Section 139B of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW)." 'Whether the respondent failed to keep proper records and whether that conduct amounted to unsatisfactory professional conduct.' 'Whether the established particulars of Complaints One and Two amounted to professional misconduct under Section 139E of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW).' "Whether the respondent's belief as to the patient's wishes and the circumstances in which he acted prevented a finding of professional misconduct."]
Ratio Decidendi
Complaints One and Two were established because the respondent failed to pursue appropriate investigative and proactive management, failed to ensure appropriate monitoring and reassessment, failed to obtain a CT scan or independent medical opinion, gave advice to the patient's proxy that was flawed by the absence of proper investigation, and failed to keep proper records. Complaint Three was not established because, applying the Briginshaw approach and evaluating the overall circumstances, the Tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent's conduct was sufficiently serious to amount to professional misconduct: he acted honestly and in what he perceived to be his mother's best interests...
Court Disposition
Complaints One and Two established; Complaint Three not established; matter stood over for consideration of protective orders; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Complaints One and Two of the Amended Notice of Complaint are found to be established.' 'Complaint Three is found not to have been established.' 'The matter is stood over for the consideration of protective orders to 22 May 2013.' 'The costs of the hearing to date are reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment