Health Care Complaints Commission v Dowla [2018] NSWCATOD 81
A decision made under s 165L of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) is an interlocutory decision within the meaning of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). The Tribunal List Manager, or their delegate, therefore has the jurisdiction to make such orders, including varying conditions...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Health Care Complaints Commission; Respondent: Mohammed Shareef-Ud Dowla
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Occupational/professional Disciplinary Proceedings / Interlocutory Decision on Variation of Registration Conditions Pending Final Disciplinary Orders
- Outcome
- Conditions on registration varied; interlocutory orders granted; further directions listed.
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Orders, Tribunal Powers, Professional Misconduct, Disciplinary Proceedings, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Health Care Complaints Commission
Applicant
Mohammed Shareef-Ud Dowla
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Occupational/professional Disciplinary Proceedings / Interlocutory Decision on Variation of Registration Conditions Pending Final Disciplinary Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a decision made under s 165L of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) is an interlocutory decision within the meaning of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
- 2 Whether such a decision can be made by the Tribunal List Manager or requires a four-member Tribunal
- 3 Whether further conditions should be imposed on Dr Dowla’s registration
Ratio Decidendi
A decision made under s 165L of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) is an interlocutory decision within the meaning of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). The Tribunal List Manager, or their delegate, therefore has the jurisdiction to make such orders, including varying conditions on a practitioner's registration, where it is necessary for public protection and falls short of a final disciplinary determination.
Court Disposition
Conditions on registration varied; interlocutory orders granted; further directions listed.
Orders
- Current conditions on Dr Dowla’s registration varied to require disclosure of misconduct finding to female patients, provision of the Stage 1 Tribunal decision, and a summary to patients in the presence of a chaperone, with records kept in the chaperone log.
- Parties to prepare and file an agreed summary of the Stage 1 Tribunal decision, or competing summaries if agreement cannot be reached, for use in complying with the above conditions, within specified timeframes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment