Health Care Complaints Commission v Dowla (Jurisdiction Application) [2018] NSWCATOD 96
Where the presiding member of the Tribunal becomes unavailable to preside over part-heard proceedings under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), s 165C of the National Law operates as a complete code. Its provisions override s 52 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), and any reconstitution of the Tribunal must proceed under s 165C. As a result, a new inquiry must be conducted by a properly reconstituted Tribunal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Jurisdiction Application / Ancillary Decision on Statutory Construction and Tribunal Reconstitution Prior to Disciplinary Orders Hearing
- Outcome
- Application upheld; Tribunal reconstitution to be conducted in accordance with the National Law.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Construction' 'tribunal Constitution and Reconstitution' 'health Practitioner Regulation' 'conflicts Between Statutes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Jurisdiction Application / Ancillary Decision on Statutory Construction and Tribunal Reconstitution Prior to Disciplinary Orders Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What is the meaning of 'vacates office' under s 165C of the National Law?" "Does the National Law exclusively govern Tribunal composition in the event of a presiding member's unavailability?" 'Is there conflict or repugnancy between s 165C of the National Law and s 52 of the NCAT Act regarding reconstitution of the Tribunal?']
Ratio Decidendi
Where the presiding member of the Tribunal becomes unavailable to preside over part-heard proceedings under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), s 165C of the National Law operates as a complete code. Its provisions override s 52 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), and any reconstitution of the Tribunal must proceed under s 165C. As a result, a new inquiry must be conducted by a properly reconstituted Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Application upheld; Tribunal reconstitution to be conducted in accordance with the National Law.
Orders
- ['The proceedings are listed for directions on 6 July 2018 at 11.30am.' 'The directions hearing listed for 3 August 2018 is vacated.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment