Health Care Complaints Commission v Alexakis [2023] NSWCATOD 99

Health Care Complaints Commission v Alexakis [2023] NSWCATOD 99

The Tribunal held that the admitted conduct and proven particulars established unsatisfactory professional conduct and, cumulatively, professional misconduct. The seriousness of repeated opioid overprescribing and inadequate record keeping for Patient A justified a finding of professional misconduct. For Patient B, while several allegations about social visits and the solicitor introduction were not established to the requisite standard, unsatisfactory professional conduct was found regarding inappropriate communications with other health professionals; clerical, recordkeeping, and Medicare billing failures. The conduct, considered together, was sufficiently serious, especially in light...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary (medical Practitioner) / Principal Judgment; Liability (stage 1)
Outcome
Practitioner found guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct; subsequent hearing to determine protective orders.
Legal Topics
['medical Practitioner Misconduct' 'professional Boundaries' 'record Keeping Requirements' 'opioid Prescribing' 'medicare Billing Practices']
['health Law' 'professional Discipline'] ['medical Practitioner Misconduct' 'professional Boundaries' 'record Keeping Requirements' 'opioid Prescribing' 'medicare Billing Practices']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Disciplinary (medical Practitioner) / Principal Judgment; Liability (stage 1)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the practitioner's conduct in relation to opioid prescribing and record keeping for Patient A amounts to unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct" "Whether the practitioner's conduct in relation to his treatment of and personal involvement with Patient B, including introducing his solicitor and benefitting from Patient B's will, amounts to unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct" "Whether the practitioner's communications with other health professionals and Medicare billing practices met the standard expected of a practitioner" 'Whether inadequate clinical records for Patient B constituted unsatisfactory professional conduct']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the admitted conduct and proven particulars established unsatisfactory professional conduct and, cumulatively, professional misconduct. The seriousness of repeated opioid overprescribing and inadequate record keeping for Patient A justified a finding of professional misconduct. For Patient B, while several allegations about social visits and the solicitor introduction were not established to the requisite standard, unsatisfactory professional conduct was found regarding inappropriate communications with other health professionals; clerical, recordkeeping, and Medicare billing failures. The conduct, considered together, was sufficiently serious, especially in light...

Court Disposition

Practitioner found guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct; subsequent hearing to determine protective orders.

Orders

  • ['The Practitioner is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct.' 'The Practitioner is guilty of professional misconduct.' 'The proceedings are to be listed for hearing to determine the orders which are necessary to protect the health and safety of the public.']