Health Care Complaints Commission v Scheggetman [2023] NSWCATOD 48
The Tribunal was comfortably satisfied that the Respondent had been convicted of the dishonesty offences and had failed to notify AHPRA of the charges and convictions within the required seven days. Although he showed remorse and insight, the theft from a vulnerable patient's visitor while working as a nurse, followed by extensive use of stolen cards, was serious, dishonest and calculated conduct inconsistent with the trust required of nurses. For public protection, maintenance of professional standards, and deterrence, the Tribunal concluded that if the Respondent were still registered it would have cancelled his registration and that a 12 month disqualification was appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Occupational Disciplinary Complaint Against a Formerly Registered Enrolled Nurse / Principal Judgment After Hearing; Final Orders Made
- Outcome
- Complaints proven; the Tribunal ordered that it would have cancelled the Respondent's registration if he were still registered, disqualified him from nursing registration for 12 months, required recording on the National Register, ordered costs, and made non-publication orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['professional Misconduct' 'unsatisfactory Professional Conduct' 'criminal Conviction' 'failure to Notify National Board' 'fitness to Practise' 'nursing Registration' 'public Protection' 'larceny and Theft' 'dishonesty Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Occupational Disciplinary Complaint Against a Formerly Registered Enrolled Nurse / Principal Judgment After Hearing; Final Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Respondent had been convicted of criminal offences in New South Wales within s 144(a) of the National Law.' 'Whether the Respondent failed to notify the National Board within seven days of being charged and convicted, contrary to s 130(1) of the National Law, amounting to unsatisfactory professional conduct under s 139B(1)(b).' 'Whether the circumstances of the convictions rendered the Respondent unfit in the public interest to practise nursing.' 'What protective orders should be made under s 149C(4) of the National Law because the Respondent was no longer registered.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was comfortably satisfied that the Respondent had been convicted of the dishonesty offences and had failed to notify AHPRA of the charges and convictions within the required seven days. Although he showed remorse and insight, the theft from a vulnerable patient's visitor while working as a nurse, followed by extensive use of stolen cards, was serious, dishonest and calculated conduct inconsistent with the trust required of nurses. For public protection, maintenance of professional standards, and deterrence, the Tribunal concluded that if the Respondent were still registered it would have cancelled his registration and that a 12 month disqualification was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Complaints proven; the Tribunal ordered that it would have cancelled the Respondent's registration if he were still registered, disqualified him from nursing registration for 12 months, required recording on the National Register, ordered costs, and made non-publication orders.
Orders
- ['An order under s 149C(4)(a) of the National Law that if the practitioner was still registered the Tribunal would have cancelled his registration.' 'An order under s 149C(4)(b) of the National Law that he is disqualified from being registered in the profession of nursing for 12 months.' 'An order under s 149C(4)(c)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment