Health Secretary in respect of NSW Ambulance v Health Services Union NSW [2023] NSWIRComm 1044
The Commission was persuaded that the proposed industrial action called for intervention because the evidence established that, whether or not PAR was maintained, the action would result in fewer ambulances on the road than would otherwise be the case, with unchallenged evidence of potential adverse patient outcomes, increased response times, and added dispatcher risk. The qualifications "where practical" and suspension where the patient's condition deemed otherwise lacked certainty and added difficulty to managing risk, and there was insufficient evidence that any March 2023 understanding about maintaining PAR had been communicated to the broader membership. In the public interest,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Notification of an Industrial Dispute and Application for Dispute Orders / Expedited Hearing; Conciliation Unsuccessful; Arbitration; Ex Tempore Decision and Orders
- Outcome
- Orders and directions made restraining the proposed industrial action and requiring notification to HSU members and representatives.
- Legal Topics
- ['industrial Disputes' 'industrial Action' 'dispute Orders' 'public Interest' 'ambulance Services']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notification of an Industrial Dispute and Application for Dispute Orders / Expedited Hearing; Conciliation Unsuccessful; Arbitration; Ex Tempore Decision and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Commission should make orders under the Industrial Relations Act 1996 restraining the proposed industrial action described as the "paramedics in training support protest".' 'Whether the proposed industrial action posed risks to patient health and safety and the public interest sufficient to warrant Commission intervention.' 'Whether the HSU\'s reliance on the words "where practical", maintenance of PAR numbers, prior March 2023 arrangements, and an asserted entitlement to take industrial action in bargaining should affect the exercise of discretion.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission was persuaded that the proposed industrial action called for intervention because the evidence established that, whether or not PAR was maintained, the action would result in fewer ambulances on the road than would otherwise be the case, with unchallenged evidence of potential adverse patient outcomes, increased response times, and added dispatcher risk. The qualifications "where practical" and suspension where the patient's condition deemed otherwise lacked certainty and added difficulty to managing risk, and there was insufficient evidence that any March 2023 understanding about maintaining PAR had been communicated to the broader membership. In the public interest,...
Court Disposition
Orders and directions made restraining the proposed industrial action and requiring notification to HSU members and representatives.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to ss 136(1)(c) and 137(1)(a) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996, the Health Services Union NSW, its officers and employees, and its members employed in the Ambulance Service of NSW must immediately cease taking industrial action described as "Paramedics in training support protest" in emails sent from...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment