R v Walker (No 7) [2017] NSWSC 1049

R v Walker (No 7) [2017] NSWSC 1049

The representations made by Ms Locke to Dr Gao were admissible under s 66A as they concerned her state of mind and intentions relevant to the proceedings, and their probative value was not outweighed by any danger of unfair prejudice to the accused or risk of misleading or confusing the jury. The representations provided context for the jury's assessment of Ms Locke's conduct and the disputed events.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling During Trial
Outcome
Objection to further hearsay evidence overruled; evidence admitted.
Legal Topics
['hearsay Evidence' 'admissibility' 'prejudice Vs Probative Value']
['criminal Law' 'evidence'] ['hearsay Evidence' 'admissibility' 'prejudice Vs Probative Value']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling During Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether hearsay representations made by Ms Locke to Dr Gao are admissible under s 66A of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)' 'Whether the disputed representations are relevant under s 55 of the Evidence Act' 'Whether the prejudicial effect outweighs probative value under ss 135 or 137 of the Evidence Act']

Ratio Decidendi

The representations made by Ms Locke to Dr Gao were admissible under s 66A as they concerned her state of mind and intentions relevant to the proceedings, and their probative value was not outweighed by any danger of unfair prejudice to the accused or risk of misleading or confusing the jury. The representations provided context for the jury's assessment of Ms Locke's conduct and the disputed events.

Court Disposition

Objection to further hearsay evidence overruled; evidence admitted.

Orders

  • ['Further hearsay evidence of Dr Gao admitted.' "Other objections to Dr Gao's evidence resolved by the parties."]