Heath Group Australasia Pty Ltd v Pengly & Ors [2001] NSWIRComm 241

Heath Group Australasia Pty Ltd v Pengly & Ors [2001] NSWIRComm 241

An applicant may only seek orders under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 in relation to contracts, arrangements, or collateral arrangements to which it is a party, as s 108 limits standing. Heath Group Australasia Pty Ltd was not a party to the arrangement between Pengly, Hanning, and Miller & Associates, so paragraphs of the summons seeking orders in relation to that arrangement must be struck out.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Application Concerning Strike Out of Summons Paragraphs
Outcome
Paragraphs 3 and 6 of the applicant's summons struck out. Costs reserved. Liberty to apply granted.
Legal Topics
['unfair Contract' 'standing Under S 108' 'collateral Arrangement' 'interlocutory Relief']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Application Concerning Strike Out of Summons Paragraphs

  1. 1 ['Whether applicant has standing under s 108 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 to seek orders regarding arrangements to which it is not a party' 'Whether arrangements alleged are sufficiently collateral to found jurisdiction under s 106' 'Whether interlocutory strike-out should be determined before substantive evidence filed']

Ratio Decidendi

An applicant may only seek orders under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 in relation to contracts, arrangements, or collateral arrangements to which it is a party, as s 108 limits standing. Heath Group Australasia Pty Ltd was not a party to the arrangement between Pengly, Hanning, and Miller & Associates, so paragraphs of the summons seeking orders in relation to that arrangement must be struck out.

Court Disposition

Paragraphs 3 and 6 of the applicant's summons struck out. Costs reserved. Liberty to apply granted.

Orders

  • ['Paragraphs 3 and 6 of the summons filed in these proceedings are struck out.' 'Costs are reserved.' 'Liberty to apply generally with respect to the proceedings.']