Heath Group Australasia Pty Ltd v Pengly & Ors [2001] NSWIRComm 241
An applicant may only seek orders under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 in relation to contracts, arrangements, or collateral arrangements to which it is a party, as s 108 limits standing. Heath Group Australasia Pty Ltd was not a party to the arrangement between Pengly, Hanning, and Miller & Associates, so paragraphs of the summons seeking orders in relation to that arrangement must be struck out.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Application Concerning Strike Out of Summons Paragraphs
- Outcome
- Paragraphs 3 and 6 of the applicant's summons struck out. Costs reserved. Liberty to apply granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Contract' 'standing Under S 108' 'collateral Arrangement' 'interlocutory Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Application Concerning Strike Out of Summons Paragraphs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant has standing under s 108 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 to seek orders regarding arrangements to which it is not a party' 'Whether arrangements alleged are sufficiently collateral to found jurisdiction under s 106' 'Whether interlocutory strike-out should be determined before substantive evidence filed']
Ratio Decidendi
An applicant may only seek orders under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 in relation to contracts, arrangements, or collateral arrangements to which it is a party, as s 108 limits standing. Heath Group Australasia Pty Ltd was not a party to the arrangement between Pengly, Hanning, and Miller & Associates, so paragraphs of the summons seeking orders in relation to that arrangement must be struck out.
Court Disposition
Paragraphs 3 and 6 of the applicant's summons struck out. Costs reserved. Liberty to apply granted.
Orders
- ['Paragraphs 3 and 6 of the summons filed in these proceedings are struck out.' 'Costs are reserved.' 'Liberty to apply generally with respect to the proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment